Laboratory Performance Diagnostic

What is actually limiting laboratory performance?

A Laboratory Performance Diagnostic establishes what is happening across the laboratory, why performance is being lost and where management should intervene first.

Client situation

When it is needed

For operations experiencing long turnaround times, growing backlogs, inconsistent output, recurring quality problems, low equipment availability, high rework or poor visibility of laboratory performance.

Operational evidence

Evidence before assumption.

Historical zinc CRM / z-score analytical-control evidence
Historical zinc CRM / z-score analytical-control evidence — Bisha Mine, Eritrea. Leadership experience prior to Sirius Analytical.

Illustrative Diagnostic Output

Observed issueTurnaround increasing
Operating evidenceBacklog + downtime + rework
Constraint / root causeCapacity loss at a critical stage
Operational consequenceFlow and turnaround deteriorate
Priority interventionWorkflow / maintenance / resource action

Sirius begins by finding the evidence that controls performance—not by assuming the answer is more equipment.

One operating system

What Sirius examines

  1. 01Demand
  2. 02Workflow
  3. 03Capacity
  4. 04Equipment
  5. 05People
  6. 06Quality
  7. 07Turnaround
  8. 08Productivity
  9. 09Cost

Sirius looks at the laboratory as one operating system. The assessment identifies where work accumulates, where capacity is lost, which constraints control output and whether resources are aligned with actual analytical demand.

Evidence base

Typical evidence reviewed

  • Sample volumes and analytical routes
  • Turnaround-time performance
  • Backlog and work-in-progress
  • Equipment availability and downtime
  • Staffing, shifts and productive hours
  • Reruns, reweighs and reprocessing
  • QA/QC performance
  • Workflow and hand-offs
  • Operating procedures and controls
  • Cost and productivity information

The work

What Sirius does

  1. 01

    Establish the requirement

    Define what the laboratory is expected to deliver to the operation.

  2. 02

    Establish the current state

    Measure how the laboratory is actually performing.

  3. 03

    Identify the constraints

    Determine where performance is being lost and why.

  4. 04

    Quantify the impact

    Show how constraints affect turnaround, capacity, quality, productivity or cost.

  5. 05

    Prioritise intervention

    Separate immediate operating fixes from issues requiring deeper modelling, investment or redesign.

Decision support

What the client receives

  • Current performance baseline
  • Principal constraints
  • Evidence behind each finding
  • Operational consequences
  • Prioritised improvement actions
  • Areas requiring deeper analysis

The objective is to give management a clear view of what is limiting performance and what should be addressed first.

Illustrative only

Example output

Illustrative output — not a historical Sirius project result.

Observed issue

Turnaround increasing

Operating evidence

Backlog accumulation + equipment downtime + rework

Constraint / root cause

Capacity loss at a critical process stage

Operational consequence

Laboratory flow deteriorates and turnaround increases

Priority intervention

Targeted workflow / maintenance / resource intervention

Product routing

When this product leads to another product

Capacity problemCapacity & Resource Model

Operating-model problemLaboratory Network & Operating Model

Implementation requirementBuild, Transition & Operate

Need for ongoing controlAnalytical Performance System

Next step

Understand what is limiting your laboratory.

Discuss a Performance Problem